The State of Ad Fraud 2026
A comprehensive analysis of invalid traffic based on a dataset of 105.7 billion ad impressions collected by Fraudlogix throughout 2025.
Executive Summary
Digital advertising continues to be plagued by invalid traffic (IVT). Our analysis of a dataset comprising 105.7 billion impressions collected throughout 2025 reveals a global IVT rate of 20.64%. This means that roughly one in five ad impressions displays characteristics of fraudulent or non-human activity—a persistent challenge with significant financial implications for the industry.
This report presents findings from Fraudlogix's global sensor network, offering the advertising industry a transparent benchmark for IVT rates across devices, browsers, operating systems, geographies, and network infrastructure. Our goal is to arm ad ops professionals, media buyers, publishers, SSPs, DSPs, and advertisers with the data needed to make informed decisions about traffic quality.
Of the 105.7 billion impressions in our dataset, 21.81 billion (20.64%) showed risk signals indicating invalid traffic. Applied to U.S. programmatic ad spend, this IVT rate suggests approximately $37 billion in advertiser dollars may be associated with invalid traffic annually.
Key Ad Fraud Findings
Our analysis revealed several significant patterns that deserve industry attention:
The data is clear: ad fraud isn't a technology problem anymore—it's an incentive problem. The tools to detect and prevent IVT exist. What's missing is the industry-wide commitment to use them consistently. Platforms need to stop treating fraud detection as a cost center and start seeing it as a competitive advantage.
Ad Fraud Statistics 2026
The following statistics represent key findings from Fraudlogix's analysis of a dataset comprising 105.7 billion ad impressions collected between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2025.
Global Ad Fraud Rate
Ad Fraud Rate by Device
Ad Fraud Rate by Region
Ad Fraud Rate by Browser
Ad Fraud Rate by Operating System
Countries with Highest Ad Fraud Rates
Countries with Lowest Ad Fraud Rates
Financial Impact of Ad Fraud
To understand the real-world cost of invalid traffic, we can apply our IVT findings to U.S. programmatic advertising spend. This calculation provides a concrete estimate of the financial impact of ad fraud on the industry.
How We Calculate the Financial Impact
Our estimate is based on three key inputs:
Financial Impact Calculation
The calculation: If U.S. programmatic ad spend in 2025 reached approximately $180 billion and 20.64% of impressions were invalid, then roughly $37 billion of advertiser dollars were associated with IVT.
$180 billion × 20.64% = $37.15 billion
Sources and Methodology
| Input | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Programmatic Digital Display Ad Spend (2025) | ~$180 Billion | eMarketer Programmatic Ad Spending Forecast (2024) |
| Average Programmatic CPM | ~$5–6 | ANA Programmatic Transparency Benchmark Report (2024) — reported average CPM of $5.82 |
| IVT Rate | 20.64% | Fraudlogix dataset analysis (this report) |
This estimate represents ad spend associated with invalid traffic—impressions that showed risk signals in our analysis. The actual financial impact depends on factors including advertiser verification practices, refund policies, and whether impressions were transacted on a CPM, CPC, or CPA basis. Nevertheless, this figure illustrates the scale of the ad fraud challenge and underscores the importance of proactive traffic quality monitoring.
Industry sources consistently project U.S. programmatic ad spending to approach $180 billion in 2025, with programmatic channels now accounting for over 90% of all digital display advertising. At an average CPM of approximately $5 (industry benchmarks range from $5–6 for standard programmatic inventory), even small percentage improvements in traffic quality can translate to significant savings for advertisers.
Methodology
This report is based on data collected through Fraudlogix's global sensor network from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025. The 105.7 billion impressions analyzed in this report represent a dataset compiled specifically for this analysis and do not represent the entirety of traffic monitored by Fraudlogix during this period. Our detection technology evaluates ad impressions in real time across multiple dimensions to assess traffic quality and identify invalid traffic patterns.
Dataset Overview
Traffic Classification
Fraudlogix classifies traffic into two categories based on a comprehensive analysis of behavioral signals, network characteristics, device fingerprints, and known fraud patterns:
For the purposes of this report, "IVT rate" represents the percentage of traffic flagged as invalid based on our detection signals. Valid traffic is considered legitimate human traffic.
Detection signals include but are not limited to: proxy and VPN detection, Tor exit node identification, known botnet signatures, abnormal behavioral patterns, device spoofing indicators, and traffic from IP addresses with established fraud histories.
Global IVT Landscape
Across the 105.7 billion impressions in our dataset, we observed a global invalid traffic rate of 20.64%. This represents a significant ongoing challenge for the digital advertising ecosystem.
Traffic Breakdown
The distribution of traffic between valid and invalid categories:
| Classification | Impressions | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Valid Traffic | 83.87B | 79.36% |
| Invalid Traffic (IVT) | 21.81B | 20.64% |
Our analysis found that approximately 21.81 billion impressions—more than one in five—showed characteristics indicating invalid traffic. This includes traffic exhibiting proxy/VPN usage, known botnet signatures, device spoofing, abnormal behavioral patterns, and other fraud indicators.
When we look at 105 billion impressions and see consistent patterns across devices, browsers, and geographies, we're not looking at anomalies—we're looking at the structural reality of ad fraud. The industry needs to move from reactive detection to proactive prevention. That's why we've made our post-bid analytics free. Getting started with fraud detection shouldn't be a barrier.
Ad Fraud by Device
Device type remains a significant predictor of traffic quality, with desktop environments showing substantially higher IVT rates than mobile or tablet devices.
IVT Rate by Device Type
| Device Type | Impressions | Valid Traffic | IVT Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 80.53B | 80.70% | 19.30% |
| Desktop | 20.23B | 72.97% | 27.03% |
| Tablet | 4.91B | 83.66% | 16.34% |
Desktop traffic shows a 27.03% IVT rate—40% higher than mobile and 65% higher than tablet. Desktop's vulnerability stems from easier bot deployment and legacy operating systems.
IVT Rate by Device Vendor
Among device manufacturers with significant traffic volume, we observed meaningful variation in traffic quality:
| Device Vendor | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Samsung | 23.68% |
| Apple | 16.15% |
| Motorola | 21.89% |
| 27.12% | |
| Oppo | 13.98% |
| Huawei | 17.70% |
| Realme | 15.00% |
| LG | 33.70% |
| Xiaomi | 19.18% |
| OnePlus | 48.66% |
Apple devices consistently demonstrate the cleanest traffic among major vendors at 16.15% IVT. This likely reflects the iOS ecosystem's tighter security controls, app store policies, and the difficulty of deploying automated systems on Apple hardware. LG devices show an elevated 33.70% IVT rate, potentially influenced by the brand's discontinued smartphone line and aging device population.
Ad Fraud by Browser
Browser choice significantly impacts traffic quality, with modern, actively-maintained browsers showing lower IVT rates than legacy alternatives.
| Browser | Valid Traffic | IVT Rate |
|---|---|---|
| OS Vendor Webview | 80.13% | 19.87% |
| Google Chrome | 78.25% | 21.75% |
| Apple Safari | 86.76% | 13.24% |
| Microsoft Edge | 58.77% | 41.23% |
| Mozilla Firefox | 74.96% | 25.04% |
| Opera | 73.82% | 26.18% |
| Microsoft Internet Explorer | 20.50% | 79.50% |
| Yandex | 72.11% | 27.89% |
Apple Safari leads with just 13.24% IVT—nearly half the rate of Chrome and a third of Edge. Safari's integration with Apple's security ecosystem and limited cross-platform availability make it less attractive for bot deployment.
Microsoft Internet Explorer shows a 79.50% IVT rate—meaning 4 out of 5 IE impressions are invalid. Microsoft Edge, despite being modern, shows a concerning 41.23% IVT rate.
The persistence of Internet Explorer traffic in 2025 is itself a red flag. With Microsoft having ended support for IE, legitimate users have largely migrated to other browsers. The remaining IE traffic is heavily dominated by automated systems and bot farms exploiting legacy configurations.
Ad Fraud by Country & Region
Geography remains one of the strongest predictors of traffic quality, with dramatic variation between regions and individual countries.
Regional Overview
| Region | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Europe | 7.80% |
| MENA | 13.78% |
| Latin America | 17.90% |
| United States | 23.69% |
| Asia-Pacific | 27.85% |
Europe leads globally with just 7.80% IVT. Strong regulatory frameworks like GDPR may contribute to higher traffic quality standards across the region.
Top Countries by Volume
| Country | IVT Rate | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23.69% | Above Average |
| South Korea | 34.91% | High |
| India | 14.50% | Below Average |
| France | 2.92% | Excellent |
| Canada | 12.28% | Below Average |
| United Kingdom | 6.34% | Excellent |
| Germany | 3.01% | Excellent |
| Spain | 21.19% | Average |
| Brazil | 10.00% | Good |
| Argentina | 26.33% | Above Average |
South Korea shows a 34.91% IVT rate across 14.1 billion impressions—significantly higher than other developed markets. Korean ISPs SK Broadband (49.44% IVT), KT (38.61% IVT), and LG Uplus (30.94% IVT) all show elevated rates, suggesting systemic issues in the Korean digital advertising ecosystem that warrant investigation.
Highest Risk Countries
Among countries with at least 100 million impressions analyzed:
| Country | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Nigeria | 61.37% |
| Uzbekistan | 61.07% |
| Bangladesh | 60.01% |
| Indonesia | 53.12% |
| El Salvador | 48.22% |
| Costa Rica | 44.79% |
| Singapore | 41.25% |
| Australia | 38.81% |
Lowest Risk Countries
These countries demonstrate exceptionally clean traffic among markets with at least 100 million impressions:
| Country | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Belgium | 0.85% |
| Greece | 1.68% |
| Italy | 1.70% |
| Netherlands | 2.24% |
| France | 2.92% |
| Germany | 3.01% |
| Egypt | 3.67% |
| Finland | 5.51% |
Complete Country IVT Reference
The following table includes all countries and territories with at least 10 million impressions analyzed. Use this reference to find ad fraud rates for specific markets.
| Country | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| United States (US) | 23.69% |
| South Korea (KR) | 34.91% |
| India (IN) | 14.50% |
| France (FR) | 2.92% |
| Canada (CA) | 12.28% |
| United Kingdom (GB) | 6.34% |
| Germany (DE) | 3.01% |
| Spain (ES) | 21.19% |
| Brazil (BR) | 10.00% |
| Argentina (AR) | 26.33% |
| Mexico (MX) | 17.96% |
| Italy (IT) | 1.70% |
| Indonesia (ID) | 53.12% |
| Australia (AU) | 38.81% |
| Turkey (TR) | 11.38% |
| United Arab Emirates (AE) | 20.28% |
| Ukraine (UA) | 36.40% |
| Poland (PL) | 30.22% |
| Japan (JP) | 6.80% |
| Sweden (SE) | 8.79% |
| Netherlands (NL) | 2.24% |
| Bangladesh (BD) | 60.01% |
| Colombia (CO) | 29.72% |
| Thailand (TH) | 7.53% |
| Russia (RU) | 13.34% |
| Chile (CL) | 14.11% |
| South Africa (ZA) | 22.94% |
| Switzerland (CH) | 24.36% |
| Guatemala (GT) | 17.06% |
| Austria (AT) | 7.36% |
| Belgium (BE) | 0.85% |
| Israel (IL) | 6.03% |
| Malaysia (MY) | 7.39% |
| Philippines (PH) | 21.01% |
| Saudi Arabia (SA) | 8.02% |
| Denmark (DK) | 9.79% |
| New Zealand (NZ) | 10.25% |
| Vietnam (VN) | 10.67% |
| Ecuador (EC) | 25.74% |
| Singapore (SG) | 41.25% |
| Uzbekistan (UZ) | 61.07% |
| Romania (RO) | 16.09% |
| Egypt (EG) | 3.67% |
| Costa Rica (CR) | 44.79% |
| Portugal (PT) | 5.70% |
| Peru (PE) | 19.20% |
| Serbia (RS) | 30.68% |
| Finland (FI) | 5.51% |
| Nigeria (NG) | 61.37% |
| Norway (NO) | 10.20% |
| El Salvador (SV) | 48.22% |
| Pakistan (PK) | 14.31% |
| China (CN) | 6.28% |
| Greece (GR) | 1.68% |
| Hong Kong (HK) | 22.73% |
| Honduras (HN) | 67.52% |
| Kazakhstan (KZ) | 11.06% |
| Uruguay (UY) | 2.99% |
| Czech Republic (CZ) | 7.22% |
| Azerbaijan (AZ) | 49.46% |
| Hungary (HU) | 4.92% |
| Lithuania (LT) | 5.88% |
| Qatar (QA) | 28.01% |
| Kyrgyzstan (KG) | 20.22% |
| Georgia (GE) | 23.55% |
| Nepal (NP) | 14.00% |
| Slovakia (SK) | 37.63% |
| Taiwan (TW) | 9.40% |
| Iraq (IQ) | 44.31% |
| Algeria (DZ) | 6.19% |
| Bulgaria (BG) | 2.39% |
| Tanzania (TZ) | 6.44% |
| Puerto Rico (PR) | 11.37% |
| Ireland (IE) | 11.09% |
| Ghana (GH) | 8.78% |
| Kenya (KE) | 25.44% |
| Kuwait (KW) | 13.08% |
| Oman (OM) | 21.79% |
| Lebanon (LB) | 54.82% |
| Sri Lanka (LK) | 6.12% |
| Venezuela (VE) | 28.84% |
| Benin (BJ) | 11.17% |
| Croatia (HR) | 20.33% |
| Morocco (MA) | 6.77% |
| Latvia (LV) | 20.08% |
| Belarus (BY) | 16.63% |
| Uganda (UG) | 18.40% |
| Palestine (PS) | 43.71% |
| Ivory Coast (CI) | 8.21% |
| Senegal (SN) | 3.04% |
| Slovenia (SI) | 5.27% |
| Estonia (EE) | 4.30% |
| Bahrain (BH) | 28.73% |
| Tunisia (TN) | 9.24% |
| Cambodia (KH) | 34.15% |
| Dominican Republic (DO) | 15.73% |
| Jordan (JO) | 10.13% |
| Iran (IR) | 9.80% |
| Paraguay (PY) | 10.55% |
| Panama (PA) | 3.47% |
| Moldova (MD) | 18.02% |
| Nicaragua (NI) | 21.56% |
| Burkina Faso (BF) | 10.01% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA) | 10.09% |
| Ethiopia (ET) | 27.92% |
| Luxembourg (LU) | 2.87% |
| Bolivia (BO) | 9.64% |
| Albania (AL) | 29.56% |
| Rwanda (RW) | 21.71% |
| Cameroon (CM) | 25.18% |
| Haiti (HT) | 26.24% |
| Montenegro (ME) | 25.91% |
Infrastructure Analysis
Network infrastructure provides crucial signals for traffic quality assessment. The origin of traffic—whether from residential ISPs, mobile carriers, or VPN providers—significantly impacts the likelihood of invalid traffic.
Cleanest Residential ISPs
Major residential ISPs demonstrate significantly cleaner traffic profiles:
| ISP | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Free SAS (France) | 0.12% |
| Vodafone UK | 0.14% |
| O2 Deutschland | 0.15% |
| Sky Broadband | 0.19% |
| Deutsche Telekom AG | 0.56% |
| Verizon Wireless | 1.57% |
| Jio (India) | 2.01% |
| Orange | 2.42% |
| Comcast Cable | 5.27% |
Ad Fraud by Operating System
Operating system data reveals a clear correlation between software age and fraud rates. Outdated operating systems are disproportionately represented in invalid traffic, while current versions show substantially lower IVT rates.
IVT Rate by OS Family
| OS Family | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| macOS | 12.97% |
| iOS | 16.15% |
| ChromeOS | 17.12% |
| Android | 20.25% |
| Windows | 30.55% |
| Linux | 41.78% |
Apple's ecosystem shows the lowest IVT rates: macOS at 12.97% and iOS at 16.15%. The closed ecosystem, stringent app review process, and hardware-software integration create significant barriers for fraudsters.
The Legacy Software Problem
Outdated operating systems are heavily exploited by bot networks. The correlation between software age and fraud rate is stark:
| Windows Version | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Windows 8 | 76.26% |
| Windows 8.1 | 47.98% |
| Windows 10 (NT 10.0) | 38.21% |
| Windows 7 | 34.32% |
| Windows 11 (pv 15.0.0) | 32.51% |
| Windows 11 (pv 19.0.0) | 20.09% |
Windows 8 shows a 76.26% IVT rate—meaning 3 out of 4 impressions from Windows 8 systems are fraudulent. With Microsoft having ended support, legitimate Windows 8 usage is minimal; remaining traffic is predominantly automated.
Android Version Analysis
| Android Version | IVT Rate |
|---|---|
| Android 7.1.1 | 55.48% |
| Android 7.0 | 49.05% |
| Android 6.0.1 | 35.95% |
| Android 8.0.0 | 33.08% |
| Android 9 | 24.11% |
| Android 10 | 16.35% |
| Android 14 | 21.04% |
| Android 15 | 22.60% |
Android 7 and earlier versions show IVT rates between 35-55%, while current versions (Android 14, 15, 16) cluster around 21-23%. The elevated rates on older Android versions reflect both exploitation of outdated security and the prevalence of device farms using cheap legacy hardware.
See Your Own Traffic Quality
Get started with Fraudlogix's free Post-Bid Analytics to benchmark your traffic against these industry findings. No commitment required.
Ad Fraud Prevention Recommendations
Based on our analysis of 105.7 billion impressions, we offer the following recommendations for stakeholders across the digital advertising ecosystem:
For Publishers and SSPs
Implement pre-bid filtering. Our data shows that proactive blocking of known-bad traffic sources—particularly VPN exit nodes and IPs with fraud histories—can significantly reduce IVT exposure before impressions are sold. Fraudlogix's Pre-Bid IP Blocklist, updated hourly with over 30 million IPs exhibiting fraudulent behavior, provides this capability at scale.
Monitor legacy browser and OS traffic. Traffic from Internet Explorer (79.50% IVT), Windows 8 (76.26% IVT), and Android 7 or earlier (49%+ IVT) should be scrutinized carefully. Consider excluding or closely monitoring these segments.
Apply geographic risk adjustments. Traffic from high-risk countries deserves additional scrutiny. Implement tiered verification based on geographic risk profiles.
For DSPs and Advertisers
Favor tablet and mobile inventory. Tablet (16.34% IVT) and mobile (19.30% IVT) traffic consistently outperform desktop (27.03% IVT) in quality metrics. Weight media plans accordingly.
Prioritize Apple ecosystem inventory. Safari (13.24% IVT), iOS (16.15% IVT), and macOS (12.97% IVT) represent the cleanest segments in our data. Premium pricing for Apple inventory reflects genuine quality differences.
For the Industry
Invest in transparency. The persistence of ad fraud reflects misaligned incentives more than technical limitations. Platforms that profit from impression volume regardless of quality have little motivation to eliminate fraud. Industry-wide adoption of transparent traffic quality metrics would shift these incentives.
Sunset legacy technology. The data clearly shows that outdated software is heavily exploited. Industry pressure to deprecate support for legacy browsers and operating systems would eliminate significant fraud vectors.
Standardize risk classification. Consistent risk taxonomy across verification vendors would enable better benchmarking and accountability. Current fragmentation makes apples-to-apples comparison difficult.
About Fraudlogix
Fraudlogix has been fighting digital fraud since 2010. For 16 years, we've helped platforms distinguish human from bot traffic in real time across advertising, affiliate marketing, e-commerce, cybersecurity, banking, fintech, and gaming.
Our detection capabilities include IP risk scoring and reputation analysis, bot and traffic verification, click fraud prevention, and account risk screening. We deliver these capabilities through flexible integration options: pixel and server-side implementations, real-time IP Risk API, and live IP blocklists for platform-scale enforcement.
Unlike verification vendors that primarily serve advertisers, Fraudlogix is built for the sell side—SSPs, ad exchanges, DSPs, and enterprise publishers who need to monitor traffic at massive scale. Our pricing model reflects this focus, making comprehensive fraud detection accessible to platforms processing billions of impressions.
Fraudlogix Solutions
Get Started
Ready to see how your traffic compares to these industry benchmarks? We offer multiple entry points:
Free IP Lookup: Check any IP address against our risk database instantly at fraudlogix.com/ip-risk-score
Free Post-Bid Analytics: Get comprehensive traffic quality reporting at no cost. See your IVT rates broken down by all the dimensions covered in this report.
Pre-Bid IP Blocklist: Block bad traffic before it enters your auction with our hourly-updated blocklist of 30M+ fraud-associated IPs.
Contact Us: Have questions or need a custom solution? Our team is ready to help.
Take Action on Ad Fraud
Don't let invalid traffic erode your margins. Start with free analytics or talk to our team about enterprise solutions.